Sparking Change: How Statistical Peer-Reviewing Is Helping Researchers On Journal Acceptance

Publishing a research paper in a peer reviewed journal seems to be one of the daunting tasks that require tackling multiple challenges on a technical and personal level. Researchers without prior experience in publishing would have a tough time understanding the nuances of acing journal acceptance rates for their research work. It is advisable for the early stage researchers to seek the expertise of Statistical peer reviewers who can help in incorporating the nuances to significantly improve journal acceptance rates.


Read on to know how the below mentioned factors handled by the expert Statistical peer review helps in journal acceptance.

The Publisher

Expert peer reviewers clearly understand the acceptance knacks and specifications of each publishing house and provide suggestions to modify the research paper accordingly to reap the best results.

Expectation of the audience

As these statistical peer reviewers have exceptional domain knowledge and exposure to the industry for a long time, they understand the audience that come with it and align the components of the research paper to be in line with the expectations of the audience.

1. Expert Suggestions

  • Logic and hypothesis support

Experienced peer reviewers review the whole research paper from outsider perspective and will have different views about the work to be published. They provide their comments on claims stated in the paper and support with the feasibility of the logic and hypothesis from their experience and knowledge.

  • Experimental design

They brainstorm about the experimental design of the research paper with the researcher and suggest including the final conclusions of the discussions which in turn would improve the journal acceptance rates.

2. Language and Grammatical

  • Text clarity and flow

Statistical peer reviewer helps in the commenting about the tendency of the content to convey the exact meaning to the outsider and modifying the content in achieving text clarity. The flow of the research paper is also aligned to contribute to the clarity of the paper for better understanding and better acceptance.

  • Grammatical errors

After all the discussed inclusions, the peer reviewer will check for grammatical errors in the document and correct them wherever necessary.

  • Formatting

A final formatting (as per the standard accepted norms) is done to improve the readability of the document. These are the factors (which are sometimes ignored) that plays significant role in the improving the acceptance rates of the journals. Smart researchers would always consider seeking statistical peer review help as a mandatory closure to the research paper than an option.
Location: United Kingdom

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Simple Data Analysis Techniques, Top 5

Image
Reacquaint yourself with simple yet important data analysis tools to transition from abstract numbers to quantifiable success. In today’s digital era, we are inundated with information—it’s overwhelming. Leaders at the top helm make decisive decisions daily. Sorting through avalanche of data to assist management’s decision making is the key. Objective is to sort and  interpret  and report findings. Toward this end, tools or techniques for statistical data analyses achieve this objective. Buzzwords we hear today are big data, hadoop, and AI; however, rudimentary tools need to be deployed to their maximum capability, which is not the case in most firms. Propel your  data analysis   program by mastering the following 5 basic techniques. Review these mundane statistical techniques, yet so vital. Techniques Merits Demerits 1. Hypothesis Testing Hypothesis tests are used in multiple disciplines such as science, research, economics, etc. Popularly known as t-testing, h
Read more

Approaching Data Analysis: How To Interpret Data? – Beginners Guide

Image
With more and more companies using big data, demand for professional data analysts has witnessed exponential growth in the recent years. “Learners of data analysis and interpretation need to have an in-depth understanding of the subject along with the statistical acumen and working knowledge of tool sets to make significant progress in the field of data analytics” – Dr. Venkatesh, Statistician. To gain good expertise in Data analysis and interpretation, the beginner learner requires good foundation in basic statistics, and better skills of how to input, process and analyze data by employing a range of data analytical and visualization tools. The objectives of data analysis and interpretation are to manipulate the data, both qualitative as well as quantitative, to obtain utilizable information that is critical to making informed decisions. It involves the usage of many different methods and procedures that can, Describe and summarize data Evaluate and enhance qua
Read more

Statswork Systematic Review Vs Meta-Analysis

Image
Systematic review and meta-analysis are often confused and used interchangeably albeit having distinct differences between them. Both are reviews of high quality evidence that form a part of literature review.  What is a Systematic review?  A systemic review seeks to find answer to a defined question by collecting and synthesizing high quality evidence from different studies. It is an exhaustive summary of all scientific evidence substantiated to a particular question. Systematic reviews came to be as a way to improve the quality of literature review. Systematic review applies to all types of research, both qualitative and quantitative. Systematic review evolved in the health care industry and clinical trials, but has since found its application in variety of fields like social sciences, astronomy, etc. What is a Meta-analysis?   Meta-analysis integrates statistically similar studies using statistical principles to achieve an estimate of common point of truth b
Read more